Saturday July 05, 2025
The Senate has outlined preconditions for Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s reinstatement, following a Federal High Court judgment in Abuja that declared her six-month suspension unlawful, PlatinumPost reported.
Justice Binta Nyako, who presided over the case on Friday, ruled that Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension was excessive and directed the Senate to lift the disciplinary action against the Kogi Central lawmaker.
The senator was originally suspended in March for alleged misconduct after clashing with Senate President Godswill Akpabio regarding seating arrangements. Matters escalated after she publicly accused Akpabio of retaliating against her for turning down alleged sexual advances—an accusation he has firmly denied.
In suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025, Akpoti-Uduaghan challenged the legality of her suspension. Justice Nyako, delivering judgment, invalidated certain provisions in the Senate Standing Rules and Legislative Houses Powers and Privileges Act for being overly broad.
According to the judge, although the Senate holds disciplinary powers, those powers must not result in disenfranchising constituents. She emphasized that the Constitution mandates the Senate to convene for 181 days each year, and a 180-day suspension effectively robbed Kogi Central residents of representation.
“The court is not saying that the Senate lacks the power to sanction a member. However, such sanctions must not negate the constitutional right of constituents to be represented in parliament,” Justice Nyako ruled.
However, the court also found Akpoti-Uduaghan in contempt due to a satirical Facebook post made during the legal proceedings. Justice Nyako ordered her to issue formal apologies in two national newspapers and on Facebook, imposing a fine of ₦5 million.
Speaking after the verdict, Senate spokesperson Yemi Adaramodu clarified that the Senate would not immediately reinstate Akpoti-Uduaghan.
“Which judgment are we appealing when they (the court) said the Senate has the right to discipline its erring members? The court has not ousted the Senate’s statutory right to punish any erring senator,” Adaramodu said.
He noted that the Senate would only deliberate on her reinstatement after she had complied with the court’s directives.
“The onus is no more on us now; it is already on her doorstep to go and apologise. Once she does that, then the Senate will sit and determine how to deal with her matter,” he added.
Senate legal counsel, Paul Dauda, SAN, described the ruling as a mixed outcome. While the court did not issue a direct order for reinstatement, it criticized the length of the suspension.
Dauda explained that the judge’s comments on the excessiveness of the punishment were non-binding.
“There was no relief asking for the suspension to be lifted. The judge only made what we call an obiter dictum, a non-binding remark, that the suspension may have been excessive,” he stated.
Dauda also pointed out that the court agreed with the Senate’s position regarding social media conduct during litigation, ordering the removal of Akpoti-Uduaghan’s satirical post and mandating a public apology along with the fine.
