Tuesday February 17, 2026
www.thenewsdesk.ng
Former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, was detained at the headquarters of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission in Abuja on Monday night after hours of interrogation over an alleged N432 billion corruption probe.
El-Rufai, a chieftain of the African Democratic Congress, is also expected to face criminal prosecution over the alleged bugging of the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu’s phone.
Multiple sources within the anti-graft agency confirmed to The PUNCH that the former governor, who arrived at the commission’s Jabi headquarters around 10am in response to an invitation, was grilled over allegations arising from the 2024 report of the Kaduna State House of Assembly which accused his administration of misappropriating loans, violating due process in contract awards and plunging the state into heavy debt.
“The commission has been investigating him for about a year now. As a commission, we don’t just rush to invite suspects. Persons accused are always the last; that is after we might have done our investigation to an advanced stage.
“We are investigating him on the allegations against him by the Kaduna State Assembly,” a senior EFCC source told one of our correspondents.
Asked late Monday night whether El-Rufai would regain his freedom, the source responded bluntly, “He is still in our custody and wouldn’t be released today (Monday).”
The EFCC spokesman, Dele Oyewale, confirmed that the former governor honoured the commission’s invitation but declined further comments on the nature of the interrogation or the next line of action.
The detention marks a dramatic escalation in the legal troubles confronting the outspoken former Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, whose recent public criticism of the Federal Government and security agencies has triggered fresh political tensions.
Alleged N423bn misappropriation
The EFCC interrogation is rooted in the report of the Kaduna State House of Assembly’s ad hoc committee constituted in 2024 to investigate finances, loans and contracts awarded between 2015 and 2023 under El-Rufai’s administration.
Presenting the committee’s report during plenary last year, the committee chairman, Henry Zacharia, alleged that most of the loans obtained by the El-Rufai administration within the eight years were not utilised for the purposes for which they were secured.
While receiving the report, the Speaker of the House, Yusuf Dahiru Leman, alleged that about N423bn was siphoned under the El-Rufai administration, leaving Kaduna State with heavy financial liabilities and a rising debt profile.
The committee recommended the investigation and prosecution of the former governor and several members of his cabinet over alleged abuse of office, award of contracts without due process, diversion of public funds, money laundering and reckless borrowing.
The Assembly subsequently endorsed a petition to the EFCC and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission, urging them to take up the matter.
Beyond the headline N423bn allegation, the legislative report also referenced disputed cash payments and contracts amounting to over N155m, as well as the alleged diversion of N1.37bn earmarked for a light rail project. It also cited the purported laundering of N64.8m by senior aides.
El-Rufai has consistently denied the allegations, describing the probe as politically motivated and insisting that all loans obtained during his tenure were duly appropriated and applied to infrastructural development, education reforms, healthcare upgrades and security interventions.
However, Monday’s detention suggests that anti-graft agencies have moved beyond preliminary review to active interrogation.
Ribadu’s bugged phone
As the EFCC grilled the former governor over financial allegations, the Federal Government filed criminal charges against him before the Federal High Court in Abuja over alleged unlawful interception of the phone communications of the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu.
The three-count charge, marked FHC/ABJ/CR/99/2026 and filed under the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc) Amendment Act, 2024 and the Nigerian Communications Act, 2003, accused El-Rufai of admitting during a television interview that he and unnamed associates unlawfully intercepted Ribadu’s communications.
According to the charge sheet, the alleged admission was made on February 13, 2026, when El-Rufai appeared as a guest on Arise TV’s Prime Time Programme in Abuja.
In Count One, the Federal Government alleged that El-Rufai “did admit during the interview that you and your cohorts unlawfully intercepted the phone communications of the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu,” an offence said to be contrary to and punishable under Section 12(1) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc) Amendment Act, 2024.
Count Two accused him of stating during the same interview that he knew and was associated with an individual who unlawfully intercepted the NSA’s phone communications without reporting the person to relevant security agencies, contrary to Section 27(b) of the Act.
Count Three alleged that El-Rufai and others still at large, sometime in 2026 in Abuja, used technical equipment or systems that compromised public safety and national security by unlawfully intercepting Ribadu’s phone communications, an offence punishable under Section 131(2) of the Nigerian Communications Act, 2003.
The prosecution claimed that the alleged act, which the defendant reportedly admitted to during the television interview, instilled “reasonable apprehension of insecurity among Nigerians.”
No date had been fixed for his arraignment as of press time.
The criminal charges stem directly from El-Rufai’s appearance on Arise TV last Friday, where he claimed he learnt of an alleged plan to arrest him through a leaked conversation from the NSA’s phone.
“Ribadu made the call, because we listened to their calls. The government thinks that they are the only ones who listen to calls. But we also have our ways. He made the call, he gave the order that they should arrest me.
That technically is illegal. I know, but the government does it all the time. They listen to our calls all the time without a court order. But someone tapped his phone and told us that he gave the order,” he said.
The disclosure sent shockwaves through political and security circles, with analysts warning that if substantiated, the interception could amount to a grave breach of national security protocol.
Presidential aides were quick to react. The Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, accused El-Rufai of attempting to create political tension and divert attention from corruption allegations in Kaduna State.
He wrote that the former governor’s actions were meant to “create political tension in the country, create an atmosphere of fear and unrest, and then damage the government through deliberate misinformation” and “divert attention from his domestic problems in Kaduna State, where he is facing massive corruption allegations.”
In Nigeria, unauthorised phone tapping is a serious offence.
According to the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act 2015, offenders can face up to 10 years imprisonment, fines of up to N10m or both.
Under Section 12 on unauthorised interception, individuals who illegally intercept non-public communications (phone calls, emails, etc.) face a prison term of up to two years, a fine of up to N5m or both.
Recent interpretations, however, suggest that in cases involving related, more serious access offences, penalties could be extended to five years.
Unauthorised recording of private conversations, on the other hand, can lead to up to two years in prison while failure to report an illegal interception can lead to charges under the Act.
Dadiyata case reopened
In a parallel development, the Department of State Services has reopened investigations into the 2019 disappearance of Abubakar Idris, popularly known as Dadiyata, and has begun probing El-Rufai and his sons over the case.
Dadiyata, a lecturer at the Federal University Dutsinma, Katsina State, was declared missing on August 1, 2019, after gunmen reportedly took him from his residence in Kaduna. His whereabouts remain unknown nearly seven years later.
A security source told The PUNCH that the DSS recently seized El-Rufai’s passport at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, to prevent him from travelling abroad while investigations are ongoing.
“The DSS has reopened the case of the 2019 disappearance in Kaduna of a renowned government critic, Abubakar Idris, better known as Dadiyata, and several other cases of missing persons
“El’Rufai is fully aware that the DSS is investigating him and his two sons for Dadiyata’s kidnapping. That was why he rushed to the ARISE news channel to cook up stories about (Umar) Ganduje and the confessions of a ghost police officer, all in a bid to divert attention.
“He is aware of the security implications of seizing his passport. He knows he can’t officially leave the country, which is very bad for him. Several laws place a responsibility on citizens to assist with crime reporting and prevention.
“Section 123 of the Criminal Code Act prohibits the willful destruction or concealment of evidence, while the Criminal Code Act and the Penal Code, applicable to Kaduna State, deals with covering up treason, destroying evidence, or aiding suspects,” the source said.
Another source said investigators were examining social media posts made by El-Rufai’s sons, Bello and Bashir, following Dadiyata’s disappearance.
“Former governor El’Rufai claimed that until Dadiyata’s disappearance he didn’t know that anybody with such a name existed. However, social media posts by his sons, Bello and Bashir, suggest otherwise. Posts by his sons on ‘X’ clearly showed that Dadiyata was a problem for their family.
“That is why Bello and Bashir will be invited along with their father to help in our investigations,” the source added.
El-Rufai has maintained publicly that he neither knew Dadiyata personally nor had any reason to target him, insisting that the missing lecturer was a critic of the Kano State Government at the time.
(Punch)